Examining the Synergies and Differences Between Enterprise Architecture Frameworks: A Comparative Review
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research
Abstract
The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) ADM, Zachman Framework, Gartner's Enterprise Architecture Methodology (GEAM), Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework (FEAF), ISO Standard for Enterprise Modeling (ISO/IEC 19439), and the Department of Defense Architecture Framework are all examined in this comparative review paper (DoDAF). The scope,
methodology, structure, and applicability of each framework are all taken into account as well as other factors. The evaluation identifies the benefits and drawbacks of each framework and offers suggestions for how to choose the best one for a variety of situations. The study comes to the conclusion that while there is no one framework that can be used for all situations, the framework that is chosen should be based on the particular requirements and objectives of the organization as well as the environment in which it operates.
Description
A research article published in the International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research
Keywords
enterprise, modeling, domain, framework, guidelines, standards, architecture, methodology, structure, methods, continuum, matrix, language, systems, scope, focus, components, purpose, strategies
Citation
Nyale, D., & Karume, S. Examining the Synergies and Differences Between Enterprise Architecture Frameworks: A Comparative.